LO 101

L.O. 101 Brief Bank

Browse Briefs by Issue:

2(a)

2(d)

2(e)(1)

2(e)(4)

2(e)(5)

  • In re Pingle - A pre-2(e)(5) functionality brief. Just ignore the silly de jure/de facto stuff; the rest is good. Affirmed: In re Pingle Enterprise, Inc., 46 USPQ2d 1811 (TTAB 1998).

2(f)

  • In re Pingle - A discussion of 2(f) with respect to configuration marks.

Failure to Function

Specimens