|
Browse Briefs by Issue:
2(a)
2(d)
2(e)(1)
2(e)(4)
2(e)(5)
- In re Pingle - A pre-2(e)(5) functionality brief. Just ignore the silly de jure/de facto stuff; the rest is good. Affirmed: In re Pingle Enterprise, Inc., 46 USPQ2d 1811 (TTAB 1998).
2(f)
- In re Pingle - A discussion of 2(f) with respect to configuration marks.
Failure to Function
Specimens
|